|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
530
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 01:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=47868&find=unread Still wins
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
530
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 02:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Andski wrote:idg why people are so obsessed with delayed local in nullsec
i mean we might as well allow supercaps in wormholes because we're trying to homogenize the two! It might be because of all the gate camps, blobs and the fact that if you are trying to kill a miner in a cloaked ship, they have already run away before you can get near them due to the free intel machine. 'Local' Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
530
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 03:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Andski wrote:Frying Doom wrote:It might be because of all the gate camps, blobs and the fact that if you are trying to kill a miner in a cloaked ship, they have already run away before you can get near them due to the free intel machine. 'Local' Frying Doom wrote:To be honest I just like annoying you on the No-local thing. You guys bite so well. While I would like to see cloaked ships not show on local and have dedicated cloak hunters as per the other thread.
Removing local would stink. How the hell do you light a cyno without characters in every station in Null as well as having people all over the system to make sure you do not have blank spots on your D-scan. And I think removing local would be a bad idea but you asked "idg why people are so obsessed with delayed local in nullsec" So I answered. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
532
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 11:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:
And this is why K-Space is nice. Hunters and Prey have something they both like.
If you don't like Local, as Frying Doom keeps lying saying that he does, then W-Space is just a quick scan away.
Actually I am a WH dweller these days and that's why I don't believe removing local would be a good thing for Null. Even though an altering of local to not show cloaked ships would be good idea.
As I have said before I prefer the forum post "Why we cloak" Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
532
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 11:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pisov viet wrote:Sun sue wrote: 2. Delayed Local in Sov Null Sec for those who dont hold said sov.
I fixed that for you. Not that it's a good idea anyway, but at least now it makes sense. It makes sense if they come in through the gate, maybe. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
532
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 11:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Andski wrote:idg why people are so obsessed with delayed local in nullsec
i mean we might as well allow supercaps in wormholes because we're trying to homogenize the two! It might be because of all the gate camps This has nothing to do with local. This has nothing to do with local. Frying Doom wrote:and the fact that if you are trying to kill a miner in a cloaked ship, they have already run away before you can get near them due to the free intel machine. 'Local' Yes, let's depopulate null further just so people who suck ass at PVP can get a few days where their roaming gangs can actually catch someone before they go do their thing in hisec in total safety, or just jump into a rifter and farm FW for hilarious isk instead. Those where not my responses to removing local but the question as to why so many people want it removed. I was talking about the problems of Null sec, not what removing local would achieve. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
532
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 12:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Those where not my responses to removing local but the question as to why so many people want it removed. I was talking about the problems of Null sec, not what removing local would achieve. Yes, and I was debunking your assertation that people wanted to get rid of local because of gatecamps (it has nothing to do with gatecamps) and blobs (local has no effect on blobs). Everyone who puts a few seconds thought into this knows this. In fact, it has been demonstrated time and time again that the only reason anyone ever says "let's get rid of local" or "let's make local delayed" is because they think it'll make ganking easier for them, and they either never think far enough ahead to take in the repercussions of removing local (which is why I'm saying "yes, let's depopulate null further"). The reason why people want to get rid of local is because with it there, gate camps are warned of incoming blobs by alts in other systems giving them notice without any effort. Blobs know when to dock up because a bigger blob is out there.
But removing local will not solve this, as you say it would be a good way to depopulate null further. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
|
|
|